Talk:Ralph Heikkinen

Auto Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.^[?]
• This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.^[?]
• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 183 pounds, use 183 pounds, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 183 pounds.^[?]
• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as January 15, 2006.^[?]
• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called ==The Biography==, it should be changed to ==Biography==.^[?]
• Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.^[?]
• As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]^[?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 00:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Good Article Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Well done on this article. There's a few things I've noted that could use some improvement, but for the most part, you've got a very Good Article.

Record of edits:

• Fixed reference #2 - citation template was missing explicitly named title= parameter, which is required for correct usage
• Removed redlink to spring practice using popups
• Corrected grammatical error in "Freshman and sophomore years" - "some form employment" -> "some form of employment"

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Proper citation templates are needed for references #81 and #92, "Ralph Heikkinen" and "University of Michigan Hall of Honor."

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Citations are needed in the lead section, even if the same information is cited further down the article.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   To avoid making the season sections too long, I'd recommend trying to pull all awards out into a separate section. Right now they're scattered in amongst everything else and it's hard to pick out all of the honors he did earn.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   A few more images couldn't hurt. Even if you can't get one of him, try finding a stadium picture that goes along with the article well. Having a large uninterrupted block of text makes for a boring read.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   This easily passes; well done. I'd recommend taking this up to peer review after attempting to address the suggestions above to see what you need to do to get this up to FA status. This is a Good Article. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ralph Heikkinen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070827230733/http://www.databasefootball.com/teams/teamyear.htm?tm=BKD&lg=nfl&yr=1939 to http://www.databasefootball.com/teams/teamyear.htm?tm=BKD&lg=nfl&yr=1939

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)