Talk:Ralph Hancock (landscape gardener)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Untitled edit

The purpose of this wiki is two fold.

Firstly, it is to collect information on the gardens designed by both Ralph and his son Bramley. As well as gardens Ralph also designed interiors and possibly houses too.

Secondly, this wiki was an idea by members of the Hancock family to gather information on this son of Wales as sadly much of his work has long been forgotten and very little remains of the records that he once kept.

I'm not sure what you mean by "this wiki"? The purpose of Wikipedia is to report published, notable, facts only. So it is not an appropriate place to collect things not published elsewhere. But the article looks pretty good so far, though it does need sources for the facts about Hancock. Notinasnaid 15:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well, I can tell you the sources. :) The original biographical research on Ralph Hancock was carried out by the students of Neath and Port Talbot College, Horticulture department, Garden history course 2006-2007. Unfortunately there's very little published about Ralph at present, so we may be in breach of the Original Research guidelines here. The N&PTC students are gradually publishing their research so there will be citable articles soon, but unfortunately nothing at time of writing. (Disclaimer: the contents at time of writing appear to have been written by the Hancock family, using the research carried out by N&PTC as a secondary source. I haven't edited the article but I did act as a research assistant for the N&PTC course.) lathos 15:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
You are right, material on the man isn't readily available. I'll change the reference to the material, sorry if it wasn't credited correctly originally. Please feel free to contact me via here. The plan is to have a dedicated Ralph Hancock website as well as a Wikipedia page/entry. It would also be useful to have more published material from the students. Meathead1962 21:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

New source edit

A fascinating article, but I've had to add an 'original research' cleanup template to the article. However, it is fortunate that (subsequent to the conversation above) a very comprehensive biography (matching very closely to the one on Wikipedia) has been published in the free(?) Cardiff magazine City Life. It's not a major source (the sort of thing you find in dentist waiting rooms) but is a published source all the same. If the Western Mail published an article (as suggested in the footnote) it would be useful to incorporate that too. Maybe then the 'original research' and 'more footnotes' template could be removed. Sionk (talk) 02:28, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Ralph Hancock (landscape gardener). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply