Talk:Rajaram I

Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Thesocialistesq/M.lesocialiste 21:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Cleaning up this article

I have tried to clean up this article by removing the POV statements but I feel more work needs to be done. Most of the facts cited do not have references, and I've placed citation needed tags wherever I thought necessary. Also, I deleted the "An Estimate" section, as I felt it was unnecessary, and of a POV nature. In addition, I feel the title needs to be edited as Chhatrapati is a title and not part of his name. YCM Interista (talk) 04:51, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Maiden names

@Jonathansammy: Hi. Thanks for adding the sources for the maiden names of the wives. There is, however, no source for Jankibai and the linked article doesn't have a decent one either. In any event, maiden names etc. would be better off being a part of the article rather than the infobox and these women played an important role in the succession. Please consider fleshing out the article with these details. Thanks.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 07:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 7 July 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. No opposition and seems reasonable.  — Amakuru (talk) 21:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

---

Rajaram Chhatrapati → Rajaram I – The Chhatrapati is an honorific and also appears to be mis-located here. Rajaram I already directs to this article and while his common name in reliable sources is simply Rajaram (a dab), affixing a regnal number to it is not unknown. Rajaram I is already being used in the infobox. It makes sense to use it as the article's title for consistency as well: cf. Rajaram II, Rajaram II of Satara, and Rajaram III of the two successor branches. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 11:58, 7 July 2017 (UTC) --Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

• Support as nominator--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 12:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Ambikabai

@Jonathansammy: Hi, who's this new wife, Ambikabai? I see that Shivaji had a daughter by that name. A misprint?--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 19:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

The new source says Ambikabai.There is another one that said Jankibai,however, I can't find that source.Therefore Ambikabai it is until I or someone else find reference to Jankibai going sati.Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 21:25, 11 July 2017 (UTC)