Talk:Rajaraja I

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Hu Nhu in topic Copy edits by Hu Nhu

Semi-protected edit request on 12 October 2022 edit

Raja raja 1 religion is Shaivism 2401:4900:483D:9840:0:0:833:41E9 (talk) 03:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. This seems to be a controversial change (see discussions here and here), and the discussion should ideally reach a conclusion before any edit requests are made. Aidan9382 (talk) 07:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 11 November 2022 edit

NDanraj (talk) 08:58, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

To edit the religion of raja raja (shaivism)

Shaivism NDanraj (talk) 08:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. The details are covered in the article, which present a more detailed explanation. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

The house of cholas is named as Telugu chola house Potapi. edit

That is incorrect 2405:3800:878:E8EE:6D52:CFC9:9E0B:6913 (talk) 07:03, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. SKAG123 (talk) 04:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copy edits by Hu Nhu edit

I am working to improve this article as suggested in the tags. I am unable to vouch for the citations. I used existing one to apply as I revised the writing. I will likely continue to work on this article in the same manner. Kind regards to all Hu Nhu (talk) 23:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I continued to work through the article and sometimes the meaning of the original language lacked specificity. Consequently, my revisions may at times be inaccurate to the original writer's intent. Additionally, I cannot vouch for the citations. While coherent, the content should be regarded as uncertain. I find it curious that this article has a B rating. It seems far to high. This would, I believe, be best served if the article was entirely rewritten from the beginning of the writing and research process. Kind regards to all.Hu Nhu (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
On 4 APR, I tagged a section with need for clarification. There are several references to works without identifying what they are: poem, book, song, movie, play, and so on. After inserting four inline clarification needed messages, I decided to draw attention to the entire section with this section tag. Kind reagrds to all,Hu Nhu (talk) 20:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply