Talk:Rail transport in South Australia

Latest comment: 4 years ago by SCHolar44 in topic Request for comment on terminologies

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Links to RailSA, South Australian Railway Page, National Rail Museum, and SAR Weekly Notices and Annual Report indexes are all broken. A bit like South Australia's railways... 86.173.215.155 (talk) 20:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Expansion

edit

I have added a few headings that can do with some filling out - cast your eye over to Rail transport in Victoria for a way to detail the history without being a list of line opening dates, and to Rail transport in Victoria as well. Stuff like current rail operators, who owns the lines, railway preservation, safeworking system, etc... ;-) Wongm (talk) 14:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Port Broughton

edit

The Port Broughton line appears to have been isolated from other lines, particularly as hills get in the way.

The Port Broughton line may have been narrow gauge as it dates after the time (1875) when narrow gauge became the norm for most branch and minor railways.

Would the Port Broughton line have used wooden rails?

Tabletop (talk) 06:46, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ethnic slurs?

edit

Is "coolie labour" an ethnic slur? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.104.225 (talk) 04:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Request for comment on terminologies

edit

Please comment on some proposals potentially affecting articles in this subject area »» here. Cheers, SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬  at 00:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply