Removed wrong link edit

link kirat didnt lead to anything connected with the Kirat people, so I removed it.

Togrim, user of the Norwegian wikipedia, 2007-03-22

Text removed edit

Removed the following out-of-place comment about historical dispute: --Cedderstk 06:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

<RAI & LIMBU BELONGS TO KIRAT> Because, kirat has got their own history.

EG.- Once there was a great king in Nepal, he was from Kirat dynasty. His name was Yelamber hang. He was one of the most powerful king in ruler dynasty. His dynasty remained so long untill the last king Jite gasti. But, the kirati history hasn't got so much far proof of the ancient sculptures or the creative works that kirat dynasty has done. so, it prooves that kirati dynasty is so rare and old dynasty of Nepal. Kirati Ruled Nepal before Lichhavi dynasty, Rana dynasty, Shah dynasti. So, it is the one of the most rare dynsaty in history. <<<<87.113.81.148 00:04, 31 December 2006 (UTC)>>>> ...............Reply

Proposed merge with Bantawa rai edit

Could see no signs of notability for a stand alone article. Lakun.patra (talk) 12:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 February 2016 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Music1201 (talk) 05:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply



Rai peopleKhambu Rai – This article is about the specific Khambu Rai people. Most Rai people in general (such as Sunuwar Rai, Bantawa Rai, etc.) are not included. According to Gerd Hanßon "The Rai of Eastern Nepal, Ethnic and Linguistic Grouping", all Kiranti speaking peoples except for Limbuwans (maybe also Phangduwali, Belhare and Waling) are Rai. Please rename this article to make room for the general Rai people. 146.96.147.126 (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment so after the page is moved, then "Rai people" would become a set index page? -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 05:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
    Once the article is removed, the article Rai people should be reconstructed to meet the scope of the correct definition. However, it shouldn't be a disambiguation page. --146.96.147.126 (talk) 20:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. It seems like it would be more productive to just expand this article to cover all Rai people.--Cúchullain t/c 15:25, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose, scope is the (general) ethnic group.--Zoupan 18:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rai people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Birth ceromony of rai edit

Suggeation 113.199.237.208 (talk) 15:38, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:38, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply