Talk:Raheem Kassam

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 2A02:C7C:7D69:7200:657A:F7D5:D9B:5EA in topic Self written

Deletion?

edit

This article was controversially deleted in 2012[1]. The page looks uncharacteristically modest and factual at present. Now the candidate has declared his entrance to leadership campaign for UKIP, there should be no doubt about its notability, for now. Cpsoper (talk) 15:01, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Wikipedia article about Raheem Kassam was deleted on at least one other occasion. I remember very well what you are hinting at, we shall see. Philip Cross (talk) 15:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
No hints, there should be no deletion for problems with the page, only notability, I support its retention, he's definitely notable now, but I am not a closet supporter or for that matter opponent. Cpsoper (talk) 16:03, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

How was he notable in 2016? He is just your average twitter troll turned podcaster. Never got elected, never had any position that matters (a blog with a few hundred readers hardly counts), he wasn't relevant in 2016 and he sure isn't in 2020. I really do not see the point that every random twitter user gets his own wikipedia entry. 2A02:908:1084:BFE0:29D4:125B:C28B:B18F (talk) 10:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

The deletion log is here. Philip Cross (talk) 20:17, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
I think this should be in for his being notably infamous. I for one found this information very useful today in judging his words. Ioan_Dyfrig (talk) 13:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Gaetz and CNN

edit

Section needed? Wikipietime (talk) 12:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Self written

edit

This page seems to be very one sided about a man who has caused huge friction in UK society most notably around the time of the Brexit referendum and the murder of Jo Cox. This is seemingly written by the person in question 2A02:C7C:7D69:7200:657A:F7D5:D9B:5EA (talk) 17:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply