Talk:Radio occultation
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
‹See TfM›
|
The contents of the GNSS radio occultation page were merged into Radio occultation on 30 November 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Can natural-source radio signals be used? Practicality of analyzing an exoplanet's atmosphere?
editMakes sense that the GPS constellation would be used as a convenient source of strong, predictable radio signals. But could a natural source -- i.e., the objects that are targets of radio astronomy -- also be used? Or are those signals too weak? Or is it too difficult to measure the Doppler shift in those signals?
If the answer is yes, natural sources can be used, here is a follow-up question: would it be practical to use radio occultation to probe the atmosphere of an exoplanet? 50.198.139.201 (talk) 00:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Radio occultation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090515121521/http://geodaf.mt.asi.it/html_old/GPSAtmo/space.html to http://geodaf.mt.asi.it/html_old/GPSAtmo/space.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)