Talk:Radio Free Scotland

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

edit

the website is kaput...

Was it a Clandestine station edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Im assuming it was an illegal clandestine station hijacking BBC transmitters ? The article doesnt make this clear ? 213.40.128.2 (talk) 19:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

"all walks of independent minded Scots" Indepedence of mind doesn't necessarily correlate with being in support of Scottish Indepedence. This article shows clear political bias.

Internet station edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

No sources are provided for the claimed internet "revival." It is likely an unrelated operation. No institutional continuity is shown. I will remove the internet "revival" unless reliable sources are provided. The section seems intended to promote the internet station. Using the name of something famous from the past is not sufficient to gain Wikipedia coverage. Edison (talk) 16:34, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic