Talk:Radha Vallabha Sampradaya

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as High-importance).

India: Uttar Pradesh Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Vaishnavism#Four sampradayas and ither traditions|four major Vaishnavite sampradayas]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Expert review edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was: Probably notable - will remove the notability tag --B. Wolterding (talk) 11:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please leave your comments below. Thanks, --B. Wolterding (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The sect exists, albeit as a small one. It is related to, though not necessarily part of, Gaudiya Vaishnavism. --Shruti14 ^{t c s} 01:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, then I think it's probably notable - but the article needs sources for clarification. --B. Wolterding (talk) 11:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic