Talk:Radcliff, Kentucky

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Stevietheman in topic Why the extra project coverage?

Why the extra project coverage?

edit

I can halfway understand coverage by WP-KY, even though it's needless dual coverage. But WP-Cities? WP-Cities is a grandparent of WP-Louisville, and I honestly don't see what makes Radcliff, of all small cities, something that needs to be catalogued for the very high-level WP-Cities. Is there something I'm missing? After all, articles aren't catalogued for the sake of being catalogued -- there needs to be a rationale for it, and as little overlap as possible. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 22:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh, nevermind. WP-Louisville shouldn't even be covering it, as Radcliff isn't in the Louisville MSA. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 22:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Radcliff, Kentucky/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

B -- more than just a start points well sourced nice amount of info very helpful. Could use some expansion to be an A. Medium as it's not unimportant it does affect the metro area but is is not in Louisville.

Last edited at 06:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)