This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christianliturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
It's Radboud, not Radbod. For some proof, check the website of the university named after him, Radboud University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands. I will change the name of the article accordingly. --Daniel575 01:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Actually his contemporary name was Radbod (like in the Vita Radbodi). Later scholars misinterpreted it as Radbold/Radboud - an end suffix which means quite something different... Whether Radbod or Radboud should be used is another story; i think it 's not unrelated to whether choosing for Clovis or Chlodovech. The latter is historically correct, the first the common known name. Notum-sit (talk) 20:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
