Talk:Race (sociology)

It has poor, goofy and illiterate English trough out.--86.29.140.158 (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

This may be the worst page I have seen on wikipedia "The Anti-Semitic Nazis attitude towards identifying Jews relied on the nose thing allot!" is a good example of whats wrong. Poor spelling, poor grammar and no citations.

Agreed. This article is so bad in parts, it's humorous.

• "The old ideas about race were swept away along with the prejudices that followed in it's wake!"

The exclamation point is, of course, the crowning glory in this particular construction. And this passed AfD? --Aryaman (talk) 11:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation

Something to keep in mind with this article is disambiguation. It means that the link should be to [[Koreans|Korean]] instead of [[Korean]]Korean is a disam page...basically a search page. Links shouldn't go there. --User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 13:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Purpose? Scope?

What, exactly, is worth saving in this article? It appears to be a rich stew of random, mostly unsourced factoids related to a number of topics peppered with questionable claims, rolled in bad grammar and spiced with a healthy dose of exclamation points. Do the folks who voted to save this thing have some kind of plan? If so, please share your thoughts. --Aryaman (talk) 11:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

it's an involuntarily humourous pov fork of social interpretations of race, redirect there. --dab (𒁳) 12:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)