Talk:R v Marshall; R v Bernard
Latest comment: 18 years ago by PullUpYourSocks in topic Untitled
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled edit
So was this specifically a section 35 case? CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 05:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
- Only indirectly. It's about the interpretation of treaty rights and aboriginal title both of which are constitutionally protected under 35. -PullUpYourSocks 15:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)