Talk:R U Professional/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about R U Professional. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Checklinks analysis
Will go through links in article and perform some minor fixes with Checklinks report in mind, above. — Cirt (talk) 19:13, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- Went through most of them. Have another pass to do, then will be done later and update back here. — Cirt (talk) 20:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Done. Checklinks analysis now looks fine. :) — Cirt (talk) 23:59, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Requested peer review
I've started a peer review for this article, R U Professional.
Comments to help further improve quality would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/R U Professional/archive1.
— Cirt (talk) 01:59, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Peer review archived, review at: Wikipedia:Peer review/R U Professional/archive1. — Cirt (talk) 23:44, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Requested copy edit through Guild of Copy Editors
I've requested a copy edit for this article through the Guild of Copy Editors, hopefully someone will be by here in a relatively short while. :) — Cirt (talk) 00:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Done by Satkara, thank you! — Cirt (talk) 11:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Copy edit from John
After the Guild of Copy Editors pass through, this article had another copy edit from John.
Thanks very much, — Cirt (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Couple of questions from me. Why are there so many reviews in the lead? Were there other parodies of this incident? --John (talk) 00:02, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- We can certainly reduce the number of reviews in the lead, was just trying to summarize the entire article's contents to function as a standalone summary, per WP:LEAD. Other parodies include "Bale Out" and "Ocean's Three and a Half". — Cirt (talk) 00:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Forgive my ignorance of the topic. I think this should be mentioned more clearly in the article. The reviews can be condensed and summarised in the lead I think. I don't have any other concerns about the article. --John (talk) 22:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sure, your edit looks a bit better, John. Perhaps you could also have a go at condensing the reviews in the lede intro sect, and let me know when you think all's done that could be done, at this point in time? — Cirt (talk) 02:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Forgive my ignorance of the topic. I think this should be mentioned more clearly in the article. The reviews can be condensed and summarised in the lead I think. I don't have any other concerns about the article. --John (talk) 22:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- We can certainly reduce the number of reviews in the lead, was just trying to summarize the entire article's contents to function as a standalone summary, per WP:LEAD. Other parodies include "Bale Out" and "Ocean's Three and a Half". — Cirt (talk) 00:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
R U Professional - featured article candidate
I've nominated the article about the song "R U Professional" for Featured Article consideration.
It's a satirical song and a form of parody music using sampling.
Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/R U Professional/archive1.
Thank you for your time,