This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
RSSOwl - self promotional, yet another program Fuzheado 14:19, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Perhaps mention somewhere as an example RSS reader, but doesn't deserve its own article (yet). [Note: you forgot to put the VfD notice on. I've added it now.] - IMSoP 17:04, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Delete: just another RSS reader which is already listed as an external link on Really Simple Syndication. Not significant enough to warrant its own article. RedWolf 03:41, Feb 19, 2004 (UTC)
Delete: I don't agree it's self-promotional, but it shouldn't be in an article - maybe move to the dictionary?
Keep! I google for RSSOwl and get 3,700 hits. RSSOwl +java get 2,620 hits. Definitely significant enough to warrant its own article. BL 08:36, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC)
Agree with BL. It's verifiable and I see no reason to delete it. Angela. 21:25, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)
Edit and keep. Too much promotion at the moment. If we can find a way to tone it down, keeps only general info that matters, we can get a small stub. -- Bact13:14, 26 July 2005 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article makes little attempt to present the app in a neutral way. Were it not for the substandard grammar I'd suspect it of having been copied right off the website. Needs tidying. Chris Cunningham20:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Currently the article is simple, brief and neutral. Google responds with 600 000 hits on RSSOwl, so it's definetely highly significant now. For my knowledge, RSSOwl is the only mature cross-platform RSS reader. For theese reasons, I removed the cleanup tag. --gerymate