Talk:ROCS Kee Lung

Move

This article should not have been moved. Can someone move it back? A new article should be created for the Taiwanese entry. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 07:22, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

I don't see why. It is the same ship, being in service in ROCN does not erase its "past life" in US Navy.--Will74205 11:25, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Look at how HMS Upholder (S40) and HMCS Chicoutimi (SSK 879) are done. This is the standard. Please adhere to it. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 16:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject:Ships states: Ships that have changed nationality may want to have separate articles for each nationality; for instance USS Phoenix and ARA General Belgrano were physically the same chunk of iron. The end of one article should explain the circumstances of the transfer and link to the article about the new incarnation. In some cases there is little to say about some of the incarnations (Cutty Sark for instance), in which case separate paragraphs within the article work.

Therefore, I've changed the Kidd article from a redirect to its own article and changed the language of this one to stand on its own. Jinian 17:59, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Given that so far the ex-Kidd class destroyers have yet to do anything noteworthy in their RoC incarnations beyond simply existing, I'm not sure they really merit separate articles. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 09:08, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:ROCS Tso Ying (DDG-1803) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)