This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Shouldn't it be Rigol instead of RIGOL? Why or why not? --Mortense (talk) 14:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
I picked "RIGOL" since it looks like that's how they prefer to write it on their website and on their equipment, but I've seen it written "Rigol" as well. I'm honestly not sure which is actually correct. Probably the right way to decide is to look at some official documents (trademark filings perhaps?) and see how it's written there. -- CaptainTickles (talk) 04:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
