The article needs heavy rewriting edit

There are many grammar issues here! I'll rewrite the article the best I can, but I won't verify the sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thekangaroorat (talkcontribs) 06:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


False Site, Please Change edit

Can you please change the site on these, it's not correct, that site you have on there is a fan site. RBD's official site is www.grupo-rbd.com thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.110.130.58 (talk) 03:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup edit

Don't delete the 10 million is sales edit I did. It is true because their official website stated that they are not only working on a new album, but that the band has sold over 10 million copies. I accessed this information today September 28th 2007. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.230.166.23 (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please take care of cleaning up the "Trivia" section, as there are many typos, bad syntax, and other formatting issues. --Cumbiagermen 11:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply


I hate this article so much. I hate it. I really wish this band never existed. It makes me feel ashamed of being Hispanic/Latino/Mexican/whatever you want to call it. ITs not a fucking fan page for the love of jesus.--The Animal 03:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply


you should not be saying anything cuase u probably was born here thats why u ashame of them any way is not like you are better than them S/F/Hating THEY ROCK F WHOEVER DON'T LIKE THEM

"RBD" makes me proud to be Hispanic/Latino/Mexican and so are they.

I think RBD is the only reason of my hate to Mexican music. And I'm MexicanFluence 20:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Clean-Up edit

This article needs some clean up. It needs more discriptive information on tours and the soap. Please no bad behavior in the discussion please!

I cleaned the page, I think it should stay like it is, there was a lot of rubbish like tours and awards that are not even known, there were also a lot of audio samples took care of that too, come on people this isn't even a great band, it is not even a band, it's a boy band. There was way too much information, not even nsyncs wiki has this much of info.

I agree ... edit

As far i can see, someone delete my "essay" about the fake of this lip synch so called "rock band". Well i'm proud to be mexican (no "latino") but not proud about this musical shit ... RBD deserves not only be erased from the wiki, in fact they must be erased from the earth ...

--Kreen Akron 22:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Finally, someone who agrees with me. INGLEHOOD! (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

STOP! edit

I love this group so if you dont then leave! Look up other bands like Green Day, AFI or other ones. This group rocks!!!!!!

Please see WP:CIVIL. This is not a chat room or fansite. Caps in a title or sentence indicate shouting. Everyone is welcome here until their behavior indicates otherwise. May be another editor should post a Talk header on this page. Morenooso 23:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup needed edit

  • Links - This list needs cleanup. It needs work as the external links are a little too long. Please read WP:EL and WP:NOT - do not put blog or fansites please. Links to sites with copyrighted material like lyrics and videos are not a good according to the talkpages of those policy articles.
  • Unsourced statements - Definite no-no.
  • Album covers - may fail copyright discussion (see above).
  • Wikification - need to break up paragraphs into smaller cohesive sections. Morenooso 21:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good Work! edit

I like this RBD Wikipedia page! Very informative. Some things could change so it may need clean up. Overall good job to everyone who has added a little something to the page! ChrisRBD 05:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

HOW OLD ARE THE RBD MEMBERS!?!

tHEY ARE PROBABLY SENOIR CITIZENS

RBD THE BEST BAND edit

LOVE RBD....North Korea LOVE RBD RBD RBD... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.34.11.219 (talk) 13:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

RBD is creepy

Why? edit

Why have "Rebels" & "Celestial"'s portuguese album been removed from RBD's Discography (well the "Albums" section) on their Main Page since I last had to re-add them a few weeks ago?

[Note: I had re-added them today]

I mean the albums are real...

Cleanup and rewrite of October 28, 2007 edit

I've tried to clean up and adapt the article according to the Manual of Style as much as I could. There were serious Neutral Point of View issues and there are still outstanding sourcing issues. I've left things which sounded reasonably plausible, but some were either material enough to require a source or immaterial where even with a source their inclusion would be questionable. That leaves, of course, the middle-ground, for which we still need sources. While I respect that this is a fan-driven article, I ask future editors to look and list sources for specific pieces of information (charts, etc.) and events while on tour, using the guidelines set forth in WP:RS and WP:CITE.--Dali-Llama 01:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Where is the list of awards of RBD? They have a lot of awards!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.46.32.209 (talk) 01:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC) MNGHGFGCGVFGBJVNJHGReply

Peru - Chile edit

Should be noted that one of the girls said "Viva Chile" ni Peru --190.232.9.204 (talk) 02:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rbd in Greece edit

Rbd in Greece isnt as the most famous groups but the have many fans.A greek singer Tamta had remake some songs as wanna play and rebelde...The main cause that Rbd are not so famous in greece is because Erreway was more famous from the past if you want to ask m somthing send me an email at mits@mail.gr —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.140.14.226 (talk) 21:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:Nuestroamorrbd.jpg edit

The image File:Nuestroamorrbd.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --19:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

FYI edit

Revert 2010-07-10 edit

Numerous errors have been introduced into this article to include unsourced POV material, WP:MOS style and format errors, deletion of cited material and unnecessary posts in Spanish that have destroyed templates. I had to go through many versions to finally find one that did not have errors. Please learn to cite material otherwise it will be reverted. ----moreno oso (talk) 21:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on RBD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on RBD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on RBD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on RBD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on RBD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply