Talk:Rørvik Airport

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleRørvik Airport has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 23, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Rørvik Airport, Ryum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 23:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Rørvik Airport, Ryum's Norway Airlines, I TBrandley am your pilot today, we will be taking out in a few minutes to the Penticton Regional Airport. Enjoy the flight!

  • "five other regional airport" should be plural, missing an "s" at the end
  • "along with for three" remove "for", unnecessary
  • "announced on on" two "on"? Remove one
    • Would you prefer the first or the last removed? ;) Arsenikk (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • "bus service to the airport" for more clearer prose I would add "available" between "service" and "to"
  • What's the point of table being sortable if there is only one item?
    • Ask the people who made the template. It's a standardized table designed by WikiProject Airports, although it is by far the most elegant on Wikipedia. Arsenikk (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Can you ensure that the table meets WP:ACCESS for scope cols and rows
    • This uses a standardized template which is transcluded on every single airport article, so I'm not going to mess with it. WP:ACCESS and DTT are not part of the GA criteria so I would rather not pursue it any further. Arsenikk (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Can you also ensure that it meets WP:DTT for table captions?
  • Any external links?
  • Any related portals to this subject?

Great work overall. Once the above issues are addressed, I will pass the article based on the good article criteria. Well done! TBrandley 02:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review and sorry for the slight delay. As I noted above, I used a standardized template for the table that doesn't meet any guideline but is within the scope of the GA criteria. Arsenikk (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Your very welcome. I will pass the article based on your changes now. TBrandley 23:15, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Rørvik Airport, Ryum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply