This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Section "Criticism" uses the wrong meaning of the wordedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In wikipedia, a "criticism" section should be a NPOV summary of how a work or concept is received by expert commentators in the field, per definition 2 of the Cambridge dictionary "the act of giving your opinion or judgment about the good or bad qualities of something or someone, especially books, films, etc."[1].
The "criticism" section of this article is instead definition 1: "the act of saying that something or someone is bad".
This section is biased, under-referenced and reads like an opinion piece rather than an encyclopedic article. This section needs to be rewritten to give cited, attributed opinions as to why "quotaism" is a good thing or a bad thing. With so many examples of quotaism in action given, someone somewhere must have a good word to say about this.
Wikipedia will be better without this section as it currently is, if improvewments to not occur I suggest it is simply removed.
