Talk:Quora
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Charliepenandink in topic Ethical comparison to Wikipedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quora article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 28 days |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Quora. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Quora at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ethical comparison to Wikipedia edit
Couple of things - the site seems to be hugely popular amongst Indian users, which might be worth mentioning.
The second is: a criticism section is sorely needed.
Essentially the site requires user info for access, i.e. you need to be logged-in to access further answers after an initial visit.
This is in marked contrast to Wikipedia, and - given that Wikipedia preceded Quora by at least 9 years - is worth covering, as the founders were clearly aware of Wikipedia, but deliberately chose this trade-your-details-for-access method. Charliepenandink (talk) 19:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)