Merge Qumran and Qumran Caves

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To not merge as proposed; better segregation of contents has support. Klbrain (talk) 11:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

These two articles appear to have the exact same scope. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it is a problem to have two clearly delineated articles here, potentially one on the geography feature itself (the series of caves) and any associated archaeology, and the other one on the national park as an administrative unit (and any contained archaeological features) - but this arrangement would require some slight rescoping and content reshuffling to ensure that the two subject are actually properly delineated: at the present the situation is far more re-duplicative. Also, if one article is about a national park, it should be titled officially, i.e. "Qumran National Park". Iskandar323 (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Agreed with all of Iskandar's points. A straight-up merge seems like too much to put on one page, but there could definitely be some better segregation of the contents.00:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC) — Moriwen (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.