Buildings and landmarks: unsourced and laundry list boosterism. Propose deletions edit

The language itself is strong boosterism and the list of buildings is laundry list, undue. Then there is the problem of missing references. I propose broadscale deletions. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 12:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'll take that as a "yes, we agree." -- Melchior2006 (talk) 06:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Staff layoffs of 2014: Unsure if this is relevant enough. Propose deletion edit

While cutting a large number of staff can impact a university, hiring freezes and reductions in staff occur frequently at universities and businesses. Unsure if this paragraph is relevant enough to the university's history. I think this paragraph should be removed. Squiddyonwiki (talk) 10:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree with you; too much "news reporting" style, not encyclo-relevant. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 11:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Noted -- also, I added the 2020 COVID-19 lawsuit here. If you have any suggestions/opinions why this shouldnt be included let me know! Squiddyonwiki (talk) 13:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
The COVID suit is utterly relevant because it has historical significance; alone the sum of money involved makes the suit relevant. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 13:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply