This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The NYT article states that the Quincy model encourages learning by doing ie. writing words over and over and over again. So I don't think it's accurate to say he opposed rote learning. He opposed oral spelling (for the first two years of study, according to the article) and opposed the use of spelling books, but he was a strong supporter of learning by copying and mechanical repetition with accuracy (which is an example of rote learning as I understand the term). Although its short, the article could also be better cited. Some of the language used seems to be from a fixed point of view that is laudatory rather than being strictly descriptive and encyclopedic. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Until I included the word "excelled" (taken from a cited source and added to the article 20 minutes after you wrote the above), please give an example of "laudatory rather than being strictly descriptive and encyclopedic." --Technopat (talk) 19:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply