Talk:Quercus chrysolepis

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

"Clonal diversity" edit

I am puzzled by "clonal diversity of this species has been shown to be high." One would expect genetic diversity among clonally reproducing plants to be low; I'm not sure that "clonal diversity" means what the editor intended. I haven't read the reference, but I suspect this needs some wordsmithing.--Curtis Clark 15:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, this is what the authors mean, but this comment has simply been copied out of the abstract without apparent understanding of its significance. I will explain the comment in the article, if no one beats me to it. Good catch. KP Botany 17:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quercus chrysolepis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply