 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Quercus canariensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070311032841/http://www.rbgkew.org.uk:80/wcsp/namedetail.do?accepted_id=171953&repSynonym_id=-9998&name_id=171953&status=true to http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/wcsp/namedetail.do?accepted_id=171953&repSynonym_id=-9998&name_id=171953&status=true
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Content edit
I live in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and have just been on a walk where we saw a fine old Algerian oak. This in not mentioned in the article, and there is no reason why it should be. However, I am amazed at the content of the article. It is as if the tree is not found anywhere else in the world. Obviously, I am not really in a position to add more content, but the artcile certainly needs it!! --Bduke (talk) 05:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)