Talk:Queen Mary Harp

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medieval Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Medieval Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Medieval ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject Medieval ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject Medieval ScotlandMedieval Scotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Musical Instruments Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethics edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is a gem. Section "Replicas": publicity to David Kortier, to his distributor (Historical Harp Society of Ireland) and to a specific CD, by a tutor affiliated to said Historical Harp Society. Section "Recent Study": references to material not in the public domain, whose detailed content is known to the Author (K Loomis), again affiliate to this Historical Harp Society, and few others only.

Outrageous.

How about some consideration for the ethics of Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.4.60 (talk) 23:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Advertising!!!! edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some pious soul has put a banner on the "replicas" section highlighting that it looks like an advertisement. Well, he/she has been very kind. There is a link to a CD sales page!!!!! I am not removing the section in respect of the (little) information it contains, and as the names and surnames should stay there with the banner as long as possible, as an example of misconduct. 86.186.176.98 (talk) 07:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

The section was inappropriate and lacks proper sourcing, so I have removed it. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen Mary Harp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080605063622/http://www.nms.ac.uk:80/queenmaryharp-fullwidth.aspx to http://www.nms.ac.uk/queenmaryharp-fullwidth.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic