Talk:Quba rugs and carpets

Untitled

References are not in standard format... AnonMoos (talk) 18:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Unexplained content removal?

@Morris80315436 did you even read this article? Did you even check this abolmination of a article before u uselessly reverted unsourced nonesense? 2003:EA:4F4F:CFC0:640B:80EF:925C:1873 (talk) 02:55, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

@2003:EA:4F4F:CFC0:640B:80EF:925C:1873 You may say that the article isn't sourced - that's completely fair criticism. However, I advise not to use the word "pathetic" or other similar words. If you still believe removing the content is better, go on then - just don't use these kinds of words in the edit summary. Morris80315436 (talk) 03:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Alright, Ill do that 2003:EA:4F4F:CF9D:8063:A628:6C7F:FCC7 (talk) 20:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

@SomeoneIguess see? I can do it, since it actually is unsourced content and adding templates while letting unsourxed content with huge claims be on wikipedia is bad and poisons the encyclopaedia. Unsourxed content, especially containing claims like „Kuba carpets are the finest of all caucasus carpets“ must be removed without any questions asked. 2003:EA:4F4F:CF9D:8063:A628:6C7F:FCC7 (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

With the quantity of content you were removing, I believe that it would be more advisable to nominate the article for deletion. Some parts that were removed also did have citations, albeit in unusual formats, and no neutral point of view issues seem to be present. Someone, i guess^{(talk i guess|le edit list)} 21:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

how do the citations in this article look like? I cant click on these basic numbers that try to imitate a real cotation and the references part just contains regular sources about carpets in general, that dont even got a quote showing that these infos were mentioned in the source, since the chi-chi carpets exist, I wouldnt delete the entire article, just make it way smaller 2003:EA:4F4F:CF9D:8063:A628:6C7F:FCC7 (talk) 21:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

The small numbers appear to be the citation. They do, however, need to be fixed, hence the presence of the {{citation style}} template present at the beginning of the article. Someone, i guess^{(talk i guess|le edit list)} 21:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

But If you cant click on the numbers that are supposed to be citations and since the references part of the article dont show any sources that talk about those supposed carpets it makes no sense to assume that these numbers contain anything, It was probably made by a guy who just wanted to write stuff and to justify it with adding numbers which he thought would represent citations, but we dont actually got any citatioons that verify almost anything said in this article 2003:EA:4F4F:CF9D:8063:A628:6C7F:FCC7 (talk) 21:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

At the bottom of the page is a list of references supposedly used for the article, each of which appear to be at least partially related. As I mentioned, if you feel like it is needed, you may nominate the page under Articles for Deletion. Someone, i guess^{(talk i guess|le edit list)} 21:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Alright, Ill nominate it for deletion 2003:EA:4F4F:CF9D:8063:A628:6C7F:FCC7 (talk) 21:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

If you wish, I can do the process for you, without any trouble involved. Would you like me to do that for you, or would you rather do it on your own? Someone, i guess^{(talk i guess|le edit list)} 21:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

I found out that Iam pretty bad in it, I would like you to do it, since I dont really know how to.. 2003:EA:4F4F:CF9D:8063:A628:6C7F:FCC7 (talk) 21:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Understood. Someone, i guess^{(talk i guess|le edit list)} 21:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks 2003:EA:4F4F:CF9D:8063:A628:6C7F:FCC7 (talk) 21:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)