Talk:Quatuor Coronati Lodge
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Blueboar in topic Independent source needed
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is there anything more that can be said? edit
Or is this going to be a permanent stub? Blueboar 17:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Is there somewhere it could merge to? - Crosbiesmith 18:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- If there is a source for the history of the lodge, the reasons for origination and the like that would be useful. As far as notability is concerned, it was the first of the historically robust research lodges, formed in part as a consequence of the flights of fancy related to origin theories of the craft. Of course that accuracy leads to what we have now, the producer of turgid biographies rather than interesting analysis of the development of speculative thinking in the operative framework.
- The notability is perhaps debatable, remembering that the SRRS article was AFDd on that basis.
- In the spirit of open-ness I'm a member of both QCCC and SRRS.
- ALR 18:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- It is definitely notable in Masonic circles... whether that translates to WP:NOTE is another issue. I agree that it would be good to go into some of the history and the reasons for its founding etc. Blueboar 19:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Independent source needed edit
We need to cite an independent source or two (something other than the QCCC website) to establish notability... I will check to see if it is discussed in Hodapp's "for Dummies" book or Morris's "Idiot's guide"... but we should also look for other sources that are even better. Blueboar (talk) 15:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)