Talk:Quakers in the abolition movement

I'm a little confused by the introduction, it was always my understanding that Quakers were the founders of Abolitionism, not just that they "played a significant part". The Wikipedia article on Abolitionism confirms this, so why is this article stating a different premise? EyePhoenix (talk) 07:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

I added the paragraph on Quaker opposition to the abolitionist movement. While it is true that some Quakers were abolitionists, they were sharply criticized by other Quakers. I felt that the article gave readers the misleading impression that most Quakers were abolitionists. As Jordan explains in Slavery and the Meetinghouse: The Quakers and the Abolitionist Dilemma, 1820-1865, most Quakers believed that their individual dislike of slavery should be a "quiet" belief but not in any way used to support a social movement against the institution. Thus, the answer to EyePhoenix above is that it would be incorrect to say that "Quakers were the founders of Abolitionism." Quakers were very divided on slavery (not so divided on the slave trade). Individual Quakers were among the founders of Abolitionism. The Religious Society of Friends took no position on the institution of slavery. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lastudies (talk • contribs) 00:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quakers in the Abolition Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5kwb2j6Y4 to http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761570452_2/Abolitionist_Movement.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quakers in the Abolition Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090528173613/http://cghs.dadeschools.net:80/slavery/anti-slavery_movement/quakers.htm to http://cghs.dadeschools.net/slavery/anti-slavery_movement/quakers.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

One day....citations will be found.

I know this page is pretty "bottom of the barrel" but I couldn't help but notice it was citation-less. Under the presumed accuracy category this one should be seemingly filed. Perhaps if a "citations needed" box was placed over the article, some zealous lad can take care of this? If we waited for a Quaker to do it, it'll never get done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coachbricewilliams28 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)