Talk:Qila Mubarak, Bathinda

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Afghanistan

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / Asian / Indian / South Asia / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Qila Mubarak: Patiala or Bathinda

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

-- This source locates the fort in Patiala, but the articles place it in Bathinda (this one and Bathinda) --Kummi (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC) This Source mentioned above is wrong, both are separate entities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.47.196 (talk) 07:22, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

-- I think the idea to merge this with the article, Qila Mubarak, Patiala is not proper as this fort in Bathinda has an independent existence. arunbandana 16:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunbandana (talk • contribs)

-- Its a different fort at a different place only a stupid would suggest to merge it with patiala fort. do some research before suggesting anything — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.201.33.246 (talk) 21:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

-- Qila Mubarak Patiala and Qila Mubarak Bathinda are two seperate forts. Hence articles Qila Mubarak and Qila Mubarak, Patiala can not be merged. 99.179.23.228 (talk) 04:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

it's not the oldest fort of India. India's oldest fort is situated in hanumangarh (Rajasthan)

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

so please correct it 103.66.8.150 (talk) 17:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic