 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of interest edit
@MrOllie: This is not an area I am familiar with -- is there material that appears non-neutral, MrOllie? If not, could we compromise on a talk page notice, rather than a tag on the article itself or deletion of apparently useful content?
@Neilbar86:: Am I correct in assuming that you are the "N. Bar" from the references? If so, thanks for submitting this originally to the Articles for Creation service, but you should also identify yourself as such explicitly for clarity. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and follow the guidelines there.
If you remain keen for the article to be deleted, even if the notice were to be moved to this discussion page, then it can be taken to a deletion discussion where a decision will be made. I can do this on your behalf, if you desire. Espresso Addict (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- The sourcing for this article overwhelmingly comes from the originators of the idea. In my opinion it should be rewritten to be based on secondary sourcing. Frankly, though, I'm more concerned about Neilbar86's habit of linking to this page (and/or citing himself) on other articles. MrOllie (talk) 18:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)