GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Reyk (talk · contribs) 10:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this. From my first reading, my impression is that it will be passed with very few changes. I will work through it section by section over the next few days. Reyk YO! 10:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- In case you miss it, Mike Peel had a few suggestions at Talk:Pyxis#Suggestions, which I have either done or explained otherwise. I find these articles pretty tricky so appreciate it when we get an astonomer to look over it :))) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
I've had another few reads over the article and I can find nothing else to quibble about, so I am passing it. :) Reyk YO! 11:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Lead edit
- The lead should mention that Pyxis is on the Galactic plane
History edit
- The statement about Lacaille cataloguing 10,000 stars from observations at the Cape of Good Hope should have a citation.
- "All but one honoured instruments that symbolised the Age of Enlightenment."- which one? This also needs a citation.
- Ok, rather than pepper the text with cites, I have added a commented-out note as three consecutive sentences come from the same source. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Characteristics edit
This section is fine as it is.
Stars edit
The content is pretty much fine, except that the section is a bit long. Perhaps it could be divided into "Bright stars" and "Variable stars", which works well in eg. Triangulum Australe.