Talk:Pusoy dos

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

You know I always thought the order was Diamonds>Hearts>Spades>Clubs because that's how all my friends were taught and they taught me. They came from the Philipines too.-Bio2590 03:39, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, that's the same order I had learned it. That is also the rank in these rules: [1]. In addition, the form low < high is somewhat confusing to me. Such as in your comment, it seems more natural to go high > low. I shall fix the order and adjust the format. OutPhase 05:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
There seem to be more variations out there. The way I saw it played in high school was definitely clubs>spades>hearts>diamonds, but otherwise it used the President/Asshole ranking system, where straights could be as low as three and as high as you could get it, but they had to be in suit and the other players had to follow with the same number of cards and type of or pass. This variant seems to allow for more strategy, because i often saw people lie out sequences of straights without even waiting for everybody to pass because they already knew the play was unbeatable.

99.99.70.93 (talk) 19:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Issues with a couple stated rules

edit

It is mentioned in the article that a flush beats a straight, but in every variation I have ever played the opposite is true. Flush is half as common in five card-poker than a straight, but once a hand size reaches 10 cards, Straight becomes more common. In fact, at 13 cards, straight is half as common as a flush.

Also, the in the gameplay it is stated that once a person passes, they have to wait for a new round to be able to play again. It's always been my experience that you can again play when it comes back to your turn provided not everyone else had also passed, giving the last player control. I would appreciate any feedback on this. Pliam2000 (talk) 04:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pusoy Dos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pusoy Dos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply