 | A fact from Purpureocillium appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 November 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,094 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
New species edit
A second species of Purpureocillium has been described - P. lavendulum. The reference is Perdomo, Cano, Gené, Garcia, Hernández and Guarro, 2013 "Polyphasic analysis of Purpureocillium lilacinum isolates from different origins and proposal of the new species Purpureocillium lavendulum" Mycologia 105 (1) pp. 151-161 doi:10.3852/11-190 It will probably require a re-write of the Purpureocillium page, but I'm not knowledgeable/experienced enough to do it Elspooky (talk) 20:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up, I'll work on this soon. There's been so many taxonomic changes in just the past month (especially in the Agaricales, where I mostly hang out) it's hard to keep up! Sasata (talk) 20:56, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- As I understand, there are now 12 spp. - but I have only found 5 so far - I hope that others are OK with making this the genus page. I have tried to move the relevant details on Purpureocillium lilacinum, mostly unedited, to its own page (previously a redirect). Roy Bateman (talk) 09:10, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Move to new species edit
"In 1974, Charles Thom transferred the species to Paecilomyces" sounds wrong, seeing as Charles Thom died in 1956. Something seems to be wrong here. Rzztmass (talk) 11:20, 16 October 2013 (UTC)