Talk:Punk Rock Girl

Punk Rock Girl has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 6, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Punk music (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music articles

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Punk Rock Girl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Minecrafter0271 (talk · contribs) 17:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Here is my article GA review:

Lead edit

Pretty standard lead. Covers the topic, but doesn't go into detail that I hope I will see later on in the article.
Only complaint is that at the end of the lead, it talks about the groups record deal and splitting up and getting back together, which is unnecessary in my opinion. Maybe try removing the section.

It seems this issue has been fixed.

Background edit

It goes into unnecessary detail at the beginning about how the band was formed, which is irrelevant in my opinion, as the background section should be about how the song came to be, how the writer(s) got the idea, etc.

It seems that this issue has been dialed back, but still gives some information on the band which is relevant if you are like me and have never heard of them before.

Recording and production edit

"...Which horrified Genaro." I don't know why you put this in here, whoever put this in here, but I removed it, because it is biased in my opinion.

Composition edit

I would consider switching this section and Recording and production, simply because this one would have came first and it would make it easier to follow.

It seems this issue has also been fixed

Music Video edit

Nice section. Pretty standard.

Commercial Performance and Reception edit

Again, pretty standard section. Nothing our-of-the-ordinary to point out.

Legacy edit

Rather impressive summary of the legacy of this song.

Closing Comments edit

It seems the problematic areas have been cleaned up, making it fall under the criteria.

Criteria edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Since you fixed the problematic areas, I am passing this article. Congratulations!

I approach every article as though someone has no idea who the Dead Milkmen are, so I find it important to give the reader some background information about the band. I'll concede that perhaps the background section contained too much info, so I've dialed it back.

The rest of your points were taken care of, and I've adjusted some wording in the lead. Thanks. Saginaw-hitchhiker (talk) 15:10, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic