This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Searchbot edit
The message from CorenSearchBot suggesting plagiarism is entirely unfounded. The article has been derived from information in the two cited references (1964 and 2010) - not copied from an irrelevant 1978 paper on the web. I would suggest that the parameters under which CorenSearchBot operates be re-examined, since it is off-putting and rather insulting to work on an article and then have this nonsense flash up.RunningClam (talk) 16:31, 2 February 2011 (UTC)