Talk:Pumpin' Up the Party

Latest comment: 14 years ago by ThinkBlue in topic GA Review
Good articlePumpin' Up the Party has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 28, 2010Good article nomineeListed

}}

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Pumpin' Up the Party/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:  
    Well done.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
    In the Live performances section, please link "Best of Both Worlds" to its correspondence article, as at the moment it stands out as a disambiguation. May I suggest that you add {{-}} to the bottom of the Live performances section, this is a way so that the screenshot not interfere with the charts section.
    Disambiguation is fixed, but what do you mean by "interfere"? It looks fine on my computer. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 20:39, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
    Check [on the disambiguation]. In my computer screen, the chart is in the middle of the section. I guess, I'll just leave it alone.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:  
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):  
    C. It contains no original research:  
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:  
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:  
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:  
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Not that much to do. If the above queries can be dealt with, I will pass the article. Good luck!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you to ipodnano for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply