Talk:Publius Lollius Maximus

Latest comment: 8 years ago by 99.241.28.136 in topic [Untitled]

[Untitled] edit

The section 'Historian' is rubbish (deriving from the same two pages of Highet and a translation of Chaucer, cited eleven times), esp. the remarks about Chaucer. 'This claim can make available a major literary discovery of a lost work' is grotesquely unwarranted. 99.241.28.136 (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply