Wikipedia

Talk:Public participation in patent examination

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)
Learn more about this page

take out Wikipatents?

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

I may be a bit overly zealous, but I took out Wikipatents. After reviewing it, it doesn't appear to be used. Most of the forums have links to porn sites (not that there is anything wrong with that!) and even the "most active" entries have almost nothing in them. Nonetheless, feel free to overrule or show me the errors of my ways. --Nowa 19:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I took out Peer to patent online link since that appears to be redundant to the Peer to patent link above it.

I added in the Cambia patent lens since they are proposing providing annotation to existing patents in the future (which puts them on a par with Peer to Patent) and because it appears to be a legitimate site right now for patent information. --Nowa 19:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

By the way, there is also IP Patent Debate, but it doesn't appear as if anyone is using it.--Nowa 19:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I added Wikipatents back in after reading a short note in CNET on it. It is a genuine example of wiki patent commentary even if it appears to be somewhat abandoned and overgrown with weeds. It's also only been around since August of 06, so perhaps I was being a bit hasty in my earlier delete.--Nowa 02:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Third party observations in the US

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Is there a fee to be paid for filing such observation in the US? That could be interesting to add. Thanks for this nice collaboration. --Edcolins 00:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Likewise, great collaboration. The US fee is $180.--Nowa 02:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I see that third parties can submit prior art documentation for 6 (not just "2" as in the article) months after first publication of a patent application. See http://www.patentable.com/patent-prosecution-2-0-third-party-submissions-of-prior-art/ [1] for some sources of documentation, may not be sufficient as a reference "source" by itself. Also here is a link to the issue in uspto, could provide an update to the broken link on the subject by following: http://www.uspto.gov/aia_implementation/faqs-preissuance-submissions.jsp (Don't have my login info handy, sorry)64.126.59.199 (talk) 15:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ http://www.patentable.com/patent-prosecution-2-0-third-party-submissions-of-prior-art/

AskPatents.com (aka Patents.StackExchange.com)

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Should Patents.StackExchange.com be mentioned in this article? Information regarding this is at blog.stackoverflow.com/2012/09/askpatents-com-a-stack-exchange-to-prevent-bad-patents and joelonsoftware.com/items/2013/07/22.html.

Seems like it has been mentioned in another page. That other page also has a lot of information that is not mentioned in this page. Looks like this page needs an update.--Pacerier (talk) 12:26, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Information about the service (web site) could be added indeed, if it is sufficiently notable. Feel free to add some information about the service, but please with suitable references to indicate its notability. Thanks. --Edcolins (talk) 20:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Public participation in patent examination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Public participation in patent examination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Public participation in patent examination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Public_participation_in_patent_examination&oldid=1203783935"