Talk:Public hearings of the United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Public hearings of the United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Material from United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack was split to United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack public hearings on June 13, 2022 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack. |
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
article about the final report?
editJust curious if anyone is thinking about working on a new article to cover whatever is said about the final report? I guess it might be a while before there is any in-depth coverage that we could work from, though ... and I wonder if the New York Times or Washington Post will release anything good enough that would allow us to do a decent job of summarizing its contents? It wouldn't make sense to just cite random articles about this minor thing or that minor thing. Without doing WP:OR and quoting extensively from the report itself, I wonder how it could be done, or if this is worth doing at all? Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 03:29, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- I think we should follow the Mueller report model eventually, but as you say, we need RS to digest all of this first. soibangla (talk) 03:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
random links to be integrated into article
editI just trimmed the External Links section to URLs that generally talk about the subject, also removing dated links. The rest of the non-general links are posted below, and may be useful to integrate into the body of the article-Classicfilms (talk) 23:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Prepared statement of J. Michael Luttig, June 16, 2022
- Fake alternate slates of Trump electors for seven states — obtained by FOIA request
- "Read the full transcript and listen to Trump's audio call with Georgia secretary of state". CNN. January 4, 2021.
- "Read the Unsent Letter by Jeffrey Clark to Georgia Officials". The New York Times. June 23, 2022. Archived from the original on June 24, 2022.
- Video (18:49): "Inside Trump's Election Plot" on YouTube (MSNBC News; July 29, 2022)
- "Donald Trump Is Not Above The Law" (The New York Times; August 26, 2022)
- The Devastating New History of the January 6th Insurrection: The House report describes both a catastrophe and a way forward ― The New Yorker. December 22, 2022