Talk:Public Affairs (political party)

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Not done DMacks (talk) 01:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Public Affairs (political party) → Public Affairs —

• No need to disambiguate. Svick (talk) 18:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
• Retargetting Public Affairs to Public affairs is another option, but I find it slightly less preferable. Svick (talk) 20:43, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
• Do not move. To me "Public Affairs" and "Public affairs" without further description mean "affairs which are public", and not any one political group. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:32, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
• Do not move. I would say there's a huge need to disambiguate. Capitalisation shouldn't be used to differentiate between articles if that capitalisation is likely to be used erroneously. I think that a plurality of people typing in "Public Affairs" want to go to public relations, and quite a few will want to public policy (Google it and see what comes up, even for that capitalisation). However, there's no clear foremost term, so it should go to a disambiguation. Bastin 11:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
• Do not move. The primary meaning of "Public Affairs" for most users is going to be the generic term "public affairs" (the title of the disambiguation page where Public Affairs currently redirects), and the existence of the political party "Public Affairs" and the publishing house PublicAffairs indicates that there is no primary use of "Public Affairs" even as a proper noun. --Orlady (talk) 19:03, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.