Talk:Psylliodes luridipennis/GA1
Latest comment: 9 years ago by J Milburn in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 10:17, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, I'll review this. FunkMonk (talk) 10:17, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- F. von Kutschera, first name?
- "have been aided by 'stepping stone' land to the north east" of the island." Which I assume is now submerged?
- Should the binomial be bolded in the lead? A bit more complicated here, since the binomial is the article name...
- Anything in what its closest relatives are?
- Why a cite in the lead? Should be unnecessary.
- Removed. It was there to preemptively appease the DYK crowd.
- Seems a bit weird that the common name is used in the article, while the article title is the binomial. Is this common in recognised insect articles?
- Good point, reworked. 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- "distinguish it from its ally" Ally in what way? Particularly close relation? Or just a member of the genus that happens to live on Lundy?
- "the species was also willing to feed upon other crucifers taken from gardens." Under what circumstances?
- "and an undescribed race of flea beetle Psylliodes napi" Is this the short winged form mentioned under description? And shouldn't it be "the flea beetle"?
- "and the wind for pollination" Easter egg links are discouraged, not sure how to work around it.
- "The white[7] Lundy cabbage flea beetle larvae" Maybe just say white larvae here, since earlier you distinguish species by colour in the common names, so I was almost confused here.
- "Though the committee notes that "[h]ost plant numbers have been low, but relatively stable since 2001", it notes"Notes twice, a bit repetitive?
- Alright, changes look good, so I'll pass. One final thought, Psylliodes could need an article, but that's of course not part of the task here. FunkMonk (talk) 22:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)