GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 14:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
I will review. Freikorp (talk) 14:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Perhaps mention in the lead that Tim and Chris are brothers, but up to you.
- "Pssst is the second game" - do you think that should be was the second game?
- "The game received positive reviews upon release" - Considering only 'Home Computing Weekly' and 'Personal Computer Games' seem to have reviewed it upon release, I think you should reword to say it received positive reviews specifically from these two publications.
- "It was placed 40th on the "Best Software of All Time" list by Personal Computer Games." When?
- "three types of alien insect" - why is the word "alien" relevant? And can you clarify what makes the insects different?
- " the player will be able to the next level" - huh? Did you mean the player will be able to advance to the next level?
- " or they make contact with an insect" - define contact, will a life be lost if the insect touches any part of the plant?
- I think the retrospective review should be placed at the end of the section, in chronological order. And it would be good if you could flesh out the review a little.
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Overall:
Thanks for the review, Freikorp! I think I've addressed everything. I remember that this article was very frustrating to write as I spent over an hour just to scrape some reviews. The game was misspelled Psst, Psssst and Pssssst in virtually every publication, so that made it even more difficult to find reviews. The longest extract I could find was just a snippet. I have no idea why this game has less coverage than other Ultimate games. JAGUAR 15:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)