Talk:Psilocybe semilanceata/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Sasata in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 02:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
rev Rcej (Robert) - talk 02:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Robert, this one's also headed to the gauntlet eventually, so spare not the rod! Thanks Sasata (talk) 02:53, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Here we go... I found some stuff to do:
- The lead; snipette "...with a small nipple on the top." A real one? ;)
- In Taxonomy; sentence "However, the generally accepted lectotype of the genus as a whole was Psilocybe montana, a non-hallucinogenic species; if those forms of the species in the study were to be segregated, it would leave the hallucinogenic clade without a valid name. To resolve this taxonomical dilemma, it was proposed in 2005 to conserve the name Psilocybe, with P. semilanceata as the type."
- Clarify why the lectotype was P. montana; the Wiki article for lectotype is not really clear. Also, had P. semilanceata not previously been the type species?
- In Ecology, hab., dist; sentence
"Charles Horton Peck reported the mushroom to occur in New York in the early 1900s, but this was based on a misidentification with the species now known as Panaeolina foenisecii.
- If Chuck got somethin' else, why do we care? ;)
- Also, File:Mushroom-IMG 4742.JPG is sort of OR; the file description just claims its a mushroom.
- In
Entheogenicuse, let's change that section title, so we aren't assuming anyone is using it for a mystico-spiritual purpose beyond just getting high on a mushroom.
- Any suggestions? Just "Uses" doesn't seem enough to cover the totality of what's in that section. I still have the capacity to expand those sections, there's quite a bit of literature on the species; on the other hand I don't want to go into too much detail about the pharmacology of the hallucinogenic compounds, as that's more appropriate for other articles. Maybe subsection it into "History", "Chemistry", and "Risks"? The last sentence (about the PCR test) sort of seems out of place to me, but I didn't see where else to put it. Maybe in "Similar species" where I discuss other Psilocybe species? Sasata (talk) 03:17, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Also here, sentence "Despite its small size, Psilocybe semilanceata is considered a "moderately active to extremely potent" hallucinogenic mushroom."
- Does the source associate size with potency?
Also, sentence "Several studies since then support the idea that the species has a low degree of psilocybin content variability among samples, regardless of country of origin.
- Not exactly sure what you're asking here... but there have been several studies that analyze psilocybin content in various hallucinogenic species, most coming to the conclusion that concentration varies wildly depending on a number of factors, including geographical location. This species sort of bucks that trend and produces the most consistent values for psilocybin concentration, regardless of where it's from. Does that answer your question? Sasata (talk) 03:17, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Excellent! Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:35, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Results of review edit
The article Psilocybe semilanceata passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass