At this point, it seems like a merge to pseudoconvex function is appropriate. In the future, perhaps, there should be independent article, but at the moment, I think there should only be one. Sławomir Biały (talk) 13:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
- I don't oppose a merge, but I think the biggest improvement would be an example of a pseduolinear, nonlinear function. With that, and a slightly longer lede, I think this article could stand on its own as a stub or a section in the article on pseudoconvexity. — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply