Talk:Protocol (diplomacy)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page should include the ritual text recited by foreign ministers when ambassadors are presented to the chief of state. I have been trying to find this text for quite a while.

It should also include the standard text of diplomatic credentials.Scott Adler 06:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

San Jose Mine Rescue

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

They mention in the 'San Jose Mine Rescue' Wikipedia article-

   "protocolary salute"

Maybe that's worth putting in as an example, because it was a significant event involving a number of nations? Signed 220.101.66.30 (talk) 01:46, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Environmental protocol

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just moved this section and its references to a newly created Environmental protocol article; it was grossly misplaced here, being a wholly different use of the word "protocol." Textorus (talk) 09:53, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article name

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Should this be at protocol (diplomacy), rather than diplomatic protocol? We're supposed to use natural disambiguation when possible, and this seems like such a case. Does anyone have thoughts? Neutrality^talk 18:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic