Talk:Proto-Koreanic

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted from this draft on 3 January 2019 by reviewer Drewmutt (talk · contribs).

Languages

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles

Citations

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why does there need to be a citation for 'reconstructed?' It would be quite obvious since the very next paragraph says this. It's unreasonable to challenge the idea that it's reconstructed. Either we need a citation on both paragraphs or none.

VideōEtCorrigō (talk) 01:56, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Standalone

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In the current shape[1], this page is not really useful. @Kanguole: What do you think? Should we redirect it to your recently added section Koreanic languages#Proto-language? Kwami had redirected this page before, but another editor restored it. Or we could split the section out to this page? –Austronesier (talk) 15:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I agree that this article doesn't contribute any value. A large fraction of it is a misunderstanding of Vovin's spoof about Korean and Paleosiberian languages. The rest is duplicated in other articles. None of it is actually about Proto-Koreanic.

The Koreanic languages article is of a moderate size, not so long that it warrants splitting, I think. If it were split, the summary we'd want to leave there wouldn't be much shorter than the whole section. I'd be in favour of re-instating Kwami's redirect. Kanguole 15:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic