Talk:Proteogenomics
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Proteogenomics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wbacius.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dgary0202. Peer reviewers: OviniW.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Suggestions for editing
edit1. A short summary for other peptide sequencing methods can be given
2. Some formatting errors can be corrected. (Eg: Loss of the period in line 2, not capitalizing the first letter in sentence 5, loss of a space in between sentences 3 and 4)
3. A section for advantages and limitations of proteogenomics can be added
4. Methodology section can be improved by including the principle of operation and the theory behind the methodology in a simple manner
5. Some technical terms can be explained more (Eg: gene annotations, six-frame translation) to make the article easier to understand
6. A section can be added for external links
7. A "See also" section can be added
8. More secondary references can be added and cited OviniW (talk) 17:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- I suggest putting the applications section after the methods section. That is a more typical layout for a technique article. Also, see if you can get more secondary and fewer primary sources in the applications section. --Kkmurray (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Reasons for the failure to be upgraded to B class
edit1. The same reference has been used in two or more places with different numbers (eg: References 1,3,6 and 19 are the same. Also references 5 and 9 are the same. Similar case for references 13 and 16 an for 14 and 18.)
2. References 4 and 7 are not accessible.OviniW (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)